course/instructor evaluation report  

 

Macroeconomics Fall 2003:

       19 respondents in a class of 21 students

        University of Utah Sandy satellite campus

 

 

Course:

ECON 2020-070, Fall 2003

Title:

Princ Of Macroeconomics

Instructor:

HOLUMYONG,CHARAMPORN

 

 

   

Forms Received:

19

 

·                     The Course column below lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Instructor column below list the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for the instructor listed, followed by the number of students who supplied that response.

·                     The Subject column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for the item for all courses and instructors in this subject (ECON) and term (Fall 2003).

·                     The University column lists the percentage of students who supplied that response for that item for all courses and instructors which were evaluated this term (Fall 2003).

 

Course Items

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were clearly stated.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

36.8%

(7)

33.0%

40.0%

Agree

52.6%

(10)

48.5%

43.8%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

11.5%

10.4%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.3%

2.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

1.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.6%

1.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course objectives were met.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

42.1%

(8)

31.6%

38.5%

Agree

47.4%

(9)

47.1%

43.2%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

13.2%

11.8%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.6%

3.1%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.9%

1.9%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.7%

1.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course content was well organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

52.6%

(10)

34.6%

40.1%

Agree

36.8%

(7)

38.7%

36.8%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

15.8%

13.5%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.3%

4.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.2%

2.6%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.4%

2.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

42.1%

(8)

32.6%

38.3%

Agree

42.1%

(8)

39.7%

37.5%

Somewhat Agree

15.8%

(3)

16.3%

14.2%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

5.8%

4.9%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.4%

2.7%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.2%

2.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

63.2%

(12)

37.2%

41.9%

Agree

26.3%

(5)

40.2%

37.5%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

13.7%

11.9%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.0%

4.2%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.4%

2.2%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.5%

2.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I learned a great deal in this course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

47.4%

(9)

33.8%

40.7%

Agree

36.8%

(7)

36.4%

33.8%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

19.0%

15.0%

Somewhat Disagree

5.3%

(1)

5.1%

4.7%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.0%

3.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.7%

2.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective course.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Course

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

42.1%

(8)

32.1%

39.6%

Agree

47.4%

(9)

41.0%

36.8%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

16.0%

13.1%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

4.9%

4.5%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.8%

3.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.2%

3.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Instructor Items: HOLUMYONG,CHARAMPORN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was organized.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

52.6%

(10)

38.2%

43.3%

Agree

36.8%

(7)

40.6%

38.0%

Somewhat Agree

5.3%

(1)

12.7%

11.3%

Somewhat Disagree

5.3%

(1)

3.9%

3.5%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.5%

2.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.0%

1.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor was available for consultation with students.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

47.4%

(9)

42.8%

46.1%

Agree

47.4%

(9)

39.9%

37.0%

Somewhat Agree

5.3%

(1)

10.7%

11.1%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.5%

2.9%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.4%

1.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.7%

1.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

31.6%

(6)

54.3%

59.4%

Agree

57.9%

(11)

35.5%

30.4%

Somewhat Agree

0.0%

(0)

6.3%

6.4%

Somewhat Disagree

10.5%

(2)

1.9%

1.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

0.7%

0.8%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

1.1%

 The instructor presented course content effectively.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

57.9%

(11)

34.4%

41.3%

Agree

31.6%

(6)

34.5%

33.7%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

17.1%

13.8%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

6.3%

5.4%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.7%

3.0%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.8%

2.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was respectful.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

47.4%

(9)

44.2%

50.6%

Agree

36.8%

(7)

40.3%

35.6%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

9.4%

8.3%

Somewhat Disagree

5.3%

(1)

2.5%

2.4%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.3%

1.3%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.1%

1.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

47.4%

(9)

46.1%

52.4%

Agree

42.1%

(8)

36.0%

33.2%

Somewhat Agree

10.5%

(2)

10.8%

8.7%

Somewhat Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.6%

2.8%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.6%

1.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

1.8%

1.7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overall, this was an effective instructor.

 

 

 

 

 

Response

Instructor

Subject

University

Strongly Agree

47.4%

(9)

40.7%

47.6%

Agree

42.1%

(8)

38.1%

34.0%

Somewhat Agree

5.3%

(1)

11.8%

10.0%

Somewhat Disagree

5.3%

(1)

3.7%

3.5%

Disagree

0.0%

(0)

3.3%

2.4%

Strongly Disagree

0.0%

(0)

2.5%

2.5%